Tampere University of Technology

TUTCRIS Research Portal

Comparing requirements decomposition within the Scrum, Scrum with Kanban, XP, and Banana development processes

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAgile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming - 18th International Conference, XP 2017, Proceedings
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages68-83
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9783319576329
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes
Publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
Event18th International Conference on Agile Software Development, XP 2017 - Cologne, Germany
Duration: 22 May 201726 May 2017

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Volume283
ISSN (Print)1865-1348

Conference

Conference18th International Conference on Agile Software Development, XP 2017
CountryGermany
CityCologne
Period22/05/1726/05/17

Abstract

Context: Eliciting requirements from customers is a complex task. In Agile processes, the customer talks directly with the development team and often reports requirements in an unstructured way. The requirements elicitation process is up to the developers, who split it into user stories by means of different techniques. Objective: We aim to compare the requirements decomposition process of an unstructured process and three Agile processes, namely XP, Scrum, and Scrum with Kanban. Method: We conducted a multiple case study with a replication design, based on the project idea of an entrepreneur, a designer with no experience in software development. Four teams developed the project independently, using four different development processes. The requirements were elicited by the teams from the entrepreneur, who acted as product owner and was available to talk with the four groups during the project. Results: The teams decomposed the requirements using different techniques, based on the selected development process. Conclusion: Scrum with Kanban and XP resulted in the most effective processes from different points of view. Unexpectedly, decomposition techniques commonly adopted in traditional processes are still used in Agile processes, which may reduce project agility and performance. Therefore, we believe that decomposition techniques need to be addressed to a greater extent, both from the practitioners’ and the research points of view.