Comparison of community managed projects and conventional approaches in rural water supply of Ethiopia
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 04AF23059936 |
Pages (from-to) | 292-306 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Sep 2016 |
Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Abstract
This study aimed to compare Community Managed Projects (CMP) approach with the conventional approaches (Non-CMP) in the case of Ethiopia. The data collection methods include a household survey (n=1806), community representative interviews (n=49), focus group discussions with district water experts (n=48) and observations of water systems (n=49). The data were collected from seven districts of two regions of Ethiopia. The study shows that CMP have a better platform to involve the community than non-CMP. In terms of reducing distances to water points, all approaches succeeded. However, the intended amount of water supplied is not achieved in all the cases: only 25% of CMP users and 18% of non-CMP users are able to get water according to the national standard, 15 L per capita per day. Fee collection in the approaches has a high disparity in favour of CMP. To keep long-lasting services, three requirements need to be particularly fulfilled: quantity, quality and accessibility.
Publication forum classification
Field of science, Statistics Finland
Downloads statistics
No data available