Tampere University of Technology

TUTCRIS Research Portal

Comparison of laboratory-scale thermophilic biofilm and activated sludge processes integrated with a mesophilic activated sludge process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Standard

Comparison of laboratory-scale thermophilic biofilm and activated sludge processes integrated with a mesophilic activated sludge process. / Suvilampi, J.; Lehtomäki, A.; Rintala, J.

In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 88, No. 3, 07.2003, p. 207-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex - Download

@article{5e76a8b944524f93addc2412de090859,
title = "Comparison of laboratory-scale thermophilic biofilm and activated sludge processes integrated with a mesophilic activated sludge process",
abstract = "A combined thermophilic-mesophilic wastewater treatment was studied using a laboratory-scale thermophilic activated sludge process (ASP) followed by mesophilic ASP or a thermophilic suspended carrier biofilm process (SCBP) followed by mesophilic ASP, both systems treating diluted molasses (dilution factor 1:500 corresponding GF/A-filtered COD (CODfilt) of 1900±190 mgl-1). With hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 12-18 h the thermophilic ASP and thermophilic SCBP removed 60±13{\%} and 62±7{\%} of CODfilt, respectively, with HRT of 8 h the removals were 48±1{\%} and 69±4{\%}. The sludge volume index (SVI) was notably lower in the thermophilic SCBP (measured from suspended sludge) than in the thermophilic ASP. Under the lowest HRT the mesophilic ASP gave better performance (as SVI, CODfilt, and CODtot removals) after the thermophilic SCBP than after the thermophilic ASP. Measured sludge yields were low (less than 0.1 kg suspended solids (SS) kg CODfilt removed -1) in all processes. Both thermophilic treatments removed 80-85{\%} of soluble COD (CODsol) whereas suspended COD (CODsusp) and colloidal COD (CODcol) were increased. Both mesophilic post-treatments removed all CODcol and most of the CODsusp from the thermophilic effluents. In conclusion, combined thermophilic-mesophilic treatment appeared to be easily operable and produced high effluent quality.",
keywords = "Activated sludge process, Combined treatment, Mesophilic, Suspended carrier biofilm process, Thermophilic",
author = "J. Suvilampi and A. Lehtom{\"a}ki and J. Rintala",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00006-3",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "207--214",
journal = "Bioresource Technology",
issn = "0960-8524",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",
number = "3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of laboratory-scale thermophilic biofilm and activated sludge processes integrated with a mesophilic activated sludge process

AU - Suvilampi, J.

AU - Lehtomäki, A.

AU - Rintala, J.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - A combined thermophilic-mesophilic wastewater treatment was studied using a laboratory-scale thermophilic activated sludge process (ASP) followed by mesophilic ASP or a thermophilic suspended carrier biofilm process (SCBP) followed by mesophilic ASP, both systems treating diluted molasses (dilution factor 1:500 corresponding GF/A-filtered COD (CODfilt) of 1900±190 mgl-1). With hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 12-18 h the thermophilic ASP and thermophilic SCBP removed 60±13% and 62±7% of CODfilt, respectively, with HRT of 8 h the removals were 48±1% and 69±4%. The sludge volume index (SVI) was notably lower in the thermophilic SCBP (measured from suspended sludge) than in the thermophilic ASP. Under the lowest HRT the mesophilic ASP gave better performance (as SVI, CODfilt, and CODtot removals) after the thermophilic SCBP than after the thermophilic ASP. Measured sludge yields were low (less than 0.1 kg suspended solids (SS) kg CODfilt removed -1) in all processes. Both thermophilic treatments removed 80-85% of soluble COD (CODsol) whereas suspended COD (CODsusp) and colloidal COD (CODcol) were increased. Both mesophilic post-treatments removed all CODcol and most of the CODsusp from the thermophilic effluents. In conclusion, combined thermophilic-mesophilic treatment appeared to be easily operable and produced high effluent quality.

AB - A combined thermophilic-mesophilic wastewater treatment was studied using a laboratory-scale thermophilic activated sludge process (ASP) followed by mesophilic ASP or a thermophilic suspended carrier biofilm process (SCBP) followed by mesophilic ASP, both systems treating diluted molasses (dilution factor 1:500 corresponding GF/A-filtered COD (CODfilt) of 1900±190 mgl-1). With hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 12-18 h the thermophilic ASP and thermophilic SCBP removed 60±13% and 62±7% of CODfilt, respectively, with HRT of 8 h the removals were 48±1% and 69±4%. The sludge volume index (SVI) was notably lower in the thermophilic SCBP (measured from suspended sludge) than in the thermophilic ASP. Under the lowest HRT the mesophilic ASP gave better performance (as SVI, CODfilt, and CODtot removals) after the thermophilic SCBP than after the thermophilic ASP. Measured sludge yields were low (less than 0.1 kg suspended solids (SS) kg CODfilt removed -1) in all processes. Both thermophilic treatments removed 80-85% of soluble COD (CODsol) whereas suspended COD (CODsusp) and colloidal COD (CODcol) were increased. Both mesophilic post-treatments removed all CODcol and most of the CODsusp from the thermophilic effluents. In conclusion, combined thermophilic-mesophilic treatment appeared to be easily operable and produced high effluent quality.

KW - Activated sludge process

KW - Combined treatment

KW - Mesophilic

KW - Suspended carrier biofilm process

KW - Thermophilic

U2 - 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00006-3

DO - 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00006-3

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 207

EP - 214

JO - Bioresource Technology

JF - Bioresource Technology

SN - 0960-8524

IS - 3

ER -