Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review
Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers |
| Subtitle of host publication | Moscow, Russia, July 8–12, 2019 |
| Editors | Clement Fortin, Louis Rivest, Alain Bernard, Abdelaziz Bouras |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 58-71 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Volume | 565 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-030-42250-9 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783030422493 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
| Publication type | A4 Article in a conference publication |
| Event | 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, PLM 2019 - Moscow, Russian Federation Duration: 8 Jul 2019 → 12 Jul 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 1868-4238 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 1868-422X |
Conference
| Conference | 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, PLM 2019 |
|---|---|
| Country | Russian Federation |
| City | Moscow |
| Period | 8/07/19 → 12/07/19 |
Abstract
The fourth industrial revolution is forcing companies to rethink their status quo – creating a need to assess their digital maturity as a basis for improvements. As a result, there is a variety of maturity models available in the literature. This paper introduces a novel comparison framework designed to compare different digital maturity assessment models. Our framework has several steps: reverse engineering of criteria from existing models, criteria matching analysis, as well as computation of the coverage and spread ratios. These two metrics characterize respectively the similarity of two maturity models, and the spread between them. We tested the proposed approach with two well-known maturity self-assessment approaches, namely the IMPULS and PwC methods. From our analysis, we were able to derive several insights that will help to develop a new maturity model specifically dedicated to support SMEs in the aerospace industry and manufacturing sector.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- Assessment, Comparison framework, Coverage and spread ratios, Digitalization, Industry 4.0, Maturity models, Smart manufacturing