Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review
Standard
Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models. / Cognet, B.; Pernot, J. P.; Rivest, L.; Danjou, C.; Wuest, T.; Kärkkäinen, H.; Lafleur, M.
Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers: Moscow, Russia, July 8–12, 2019. ed. / Clement Fortin; Louis Rivest; Alain Bernard; Abdelaziz Bouras. Vol. 565 Springer, 2019. p. 58-71 (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review
Harvard
Cognet, B, Pernot, JP, Rivest, L, Danjou, C, Wuest, T
, Kärkkäinen, H & Lafleur, M 2019,
Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models. in C Fortin, L Rivest, A Bernard & A Bouras (eds),
Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers: Moscow, Russia, July 8–12, 2019. vol. 565, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer, pp. 58-71, 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, PLM 2019, Moscow, Russian Federation,
8/07/19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_6APA
Cognet, B., Pernot, J. P., Rivest, L., Danjou, C., Wuest, T.
, Kärkkäinen, H., & Lafleur, M. (2019).
Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models. In C. Fortin, L. Rivest, A. Bernard, & A. Bouras (Eds.),
Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers: Moscow, Russia, July 8–12, 2019 (Vol. 565, pp. 58-71). (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_6Vancouver
Cognet B, Pernot JP, Rivest L, Danjou C, Wuest T
, Kärkkäinen H et al.
Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models. In Fortin C, Rivest L, Bernard A, Bouras A, editors, Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers: Moscow, Russia, July 8–12, 2019. Vol. 565. Springer. 2019. p. 58-71. (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_6Author
Cognet, B. ; Pernot, J. P. ; Rivest, L. ; Danjou, C. ; Wuest, T.
; Kärkkäinen, H. ; Lafleur, M. /
Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models. Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers: Moscow, Russia, July 8–12, 2019. editor / Clement Fortin ; Louis Rivest ; Alain Bernard ; Abdelaziz Bouras. Vol. 565 Springer, 2019. pp. 58-71 (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology).
@inproceedings{161bc52aec2742a289840bd011e98bb6,
title = "Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models",
abstract = "The fourth industrial revolution is forcing companies to rethink their status quo – creating a need to assess their digital maturity as a basis for improvements. As a result, there is a variety of maturity models available in the literature. This paper introduces a novel comparison framework designed to compare different digital maturity assessment models. Our framework has several steps: reverse engineering of criteria from existing models, criteria matching analysis, as well as computation of the coverage and spread ratios. These two metrics characterize respectively the similarity of two maturity models, and the spread between them. We tested the proposed approach with two well-known maturity self-assessment approaches, namely the IMPULS and PwC methods. From our analysis, we were able to derive several insights that will help to develop a new maturity model specifically dedicated to support SMEs in the aerospace industry and manufacturing sector.",
keywords = "Assessment, Comparison framework, Coverage and spread ratios, Digitalization, Industry 4.0, Maturity models, Smart manufacturing",
author = "B. Cognet and Pernot, {J. P.} and L. Rivest and C. Danjou and T. Wuest and H. K{\"a}rkk{\"a}inen and M. Lafleur",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030422493",
volume = "565",
series = "IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "58--71",
editor = "Clement Fortin and Louis Rivest and Alain Bernard and Abdelaziz Bouras",
booktitle = "Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers",
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - GEN
T1 - Towards a novel comparison framework of digital maturity assessment models
AU - Cognet, B.
AU - Pernot, J. P.
AU - Rivest, L.
AU - Danjou, C.
AU - Wuest, T.
AU - Kärkkäinen, H.
AU - Lafleur, M.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The fourth industrial revolution is forcing companies to rethink their status quo – creating a need to assess their digital maturity as a basis for improvements. As a result, there is a variety of maturity models available in the literature. This paper introduces a novel comparison framework designed to compare different digital maturity assessment models. Our framework has several steps: reverse engineering of criteria from existing models, criteria matching analysis, as well as computation of the coverage and spread ratios. These two metrics characterize respectively the similarity of two maturity models, and the spread between them. We tested the proposed approach with two well-known maturity self-assessment approaches, namely the IMPULS and PwC methods. From our analysis, we were able to derive several insights that will help to develop a new maturity model specifically dedicated to support SMEs in the aerospace industry and manufacturing sector.
AB - The fourth industrial revolution is forcing companies to rethink their status quo – creating a need to assess their digital maturity as a basis for improvements. As a result, there is a variety of maturity models available in the literature. This paper introduces a novel comparison framework designed to compare different digital maturity assessment models. Our framework has several steps: reverse engineering of criteria from existing models, criteria matching analysis, as well as computation of the coverage and spread ratios. These two metrics characterize respectively the similarity of two maturity models, and the spread between them. We tested the proposed approach with two well-known maturity self-assessment approaches, namely the IMPULS and PwC methods. From our analysis, we were able to derive several insights that will help to develop a new maturity model specifically dedicated to support SMEs in the aerospace industry and manufacturing sector.
KW - Assessment
KW - Comparison framework
KW - Coverage and spread ratios
KW - Digitalization
KW - Industry 4.0
KW - Maturity models
KW - Smart manufacturing
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_6
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_6
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783030422493
VL - 565
T3 - IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
SP - 58
EP - 71
BT - Product Lifecycle Management in the Digital Twin Era - 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2019, Revised Selected Papers
A2 - Fortin, Clement
A2 - Rivest, Louis
A2 - Bernard, Alain
A2 - Bouras, Abdelaziz
PB - Springer
ER -
