Tampere University of Technology

TUTCRIS Research Portal

Urban housing density and infrastructure costs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Standard

Urban housing density and infrastructure costs. / Kurvinen, Antti; Saari, Arto.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 12, No. 2, 497, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Kurvinen, Antti ; Saari, Arto. / Urban housing density and infrastructure costs. In: Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020 ; Vol. 12, No. 2.

Bibtex - Download

@article{78f9c141d7134849889e90997ef4d3db,
title = "Urban housing density and infrastructure costs",
abstract = "Urbanisation is one of the most significant global megatrends and, as a result, major cities are facing multiple challenges. In this study, we contribute to the sustainable urban development debate and examine the relation between housing density and infrastructure costs. The analysis is based on four hypothetical design prototypes and a consistent cost calculation framework. Based on the results, infrastructure costs per capita are the highest in low-density areas and the lowest in high-density areas, if parking is excluded. However, if also construction costs of parking structures are included, the costs per capita are the highest in high-density areas. Considering the notably high cost impact of parking structures and people's limited willingness to pay for parking, municipally zoned parking requirements in urban areas are likely to result in non-optimal land use. Furthermore, construction in poor soil conditions may only be considered feasible if the floor area ratio and residential densities are relatively high. Beyond the cost benefits, the number of residents that may be accommodated is crucial and higher density in central urban locations should be promoted. We also suggest the cost of urban greenness to be reasonable relative to its many reported benefits and conclude that denser urban structure should not be pursued at the expense of green spaces.",
keywords = "Floor area ratio, Green spaces, Infrastructure costs, Parking, Residential density, Urban housing density",
author = "Antti Kurvinen and Arto Saari",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3390/su12020497",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urban housing density and infrastructure costs

AU - Kurvinen, Antti

AU - Saari, Arto

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Urbanisation is one of the most significant global megatrends and, as a result, major cities are facing multiple challenges. In this study, we contribute to the sustainable urban development debate and examine the relation between housing density and infrastructure costs. The analysis is based on four hypothetical design prototypes and a consistent cost calculation framework. Based on the results, infrastructure costs per capita are the highest in low-density areas and the lowest in high-density areas, if parking is excluded. However, if also construction costs of parking structures are included, the costs per capita are the highest in high-density areas. Considering the notably high cost impact of parking structures and people's limited willingness to pay for parking, municipally zoned parking requirements in urban areas are likely to result in non-optimal land use. Furthermore, construction in poor soil conditions may only be considered feasible if the floor area ratio and residential densities are relatively high. Beyond the cost benefits, the number of residents that may be accommodated is crucial and higher density in central urban locations should be promoted. We also suggest the cost of urban greenness to be reasonable relative to its many reported benefits and conclude that denser urban structure should not be pursued at the expense of green spaces.

AB - Urbanisation is one of the most significant global megatrends and, as a result, major cities are facing multiple challenges. In this study, we contribute to the sustainable urban development debate and examine the relation between housing density and infrastructure costs. The analysis is based on four hypothetical design prototypes and a consistent cost calculation framework. Based on the results, infrastructure costs per capita are the highest in low-density areas and the lowest in high-density areas, if parking is excluded. However, if also construction costs of parking structures are included, the costs per capita are the highest in high-density areas. Considering the notably high cost impact of parking structures and people's limited willingness to pay for parking, municipally zoned parking requirements in urban areas are likely to result in non-optimal land use. Furthermore, construction in poor soil conditions may only be considered feasible if the floor area ratio and residential densities are relatively high. Beyond the cost benefits, the number of residents that may be accommodated is crucial and higher density in central urban locations should be promoted. We also suggest the cost of urban greenness to be reasonable relative to its many reported benefits and conclude that denser urban structure should not be pursued at the expense of green spaces.

KW - Floor area ratio

KW - Green spaces

KW - Infrastructure costs

KW - Parking

KW - Residential density

KW - Urban housing density

U2 - 10.3390/su12020497

DO - 10.3390/su12020497

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 2

M1 - 497

ER -