TUTCRIS - Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto

TUTCRIS

Continuous Architecting With Microservices and DevOps: a Systematic Mapping Study

Tutkimustuotosvertaisarvioitu

Yksityiskohdat

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
OtsikkoCloud Computing and Services Science - 8th International Conference, CLOSER 2018, Revised Selected Papers
KustantajaSpringer
Sivut126-151
ISBN (painettu)9783030291921
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa
TapahtumaInternational Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science - Funchal, Madeira, Portugali
Kesto: 19 maaliskuuta 201821 maaliskuuta 2018

Julkaisusarja

NimiCommunications in Computer and Information Science
Vuosikerta1073
ISSN (painettu)1865-0929
ISSN (elektroninen)1865-0937

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science
MaaPortugali
KaupunkiFunchal, Madeira
Ajanjakso19/03/1821/03/18

Tiivistelmä

Context: Several companies are migrating their information systems into the Cloud. Microservices and DevOps are two of the most common adopted technologies. However, there is still a lack of understanding how to adopt a microservice-based architectural style and which tools and technique to use in a continuous architecting pipeline. Objective: We aim at characterizing the different microservice architectural style principles and patterns in order to map existing tools and techniques adopted in the context of DevOps. Methodology: We conducted a Systematic Mapping Study identifying the goal and the research questions, the bibliographic sources, the search strings, and the selection criteria to retrieve the most relevant papers. Results: We identified several agreed microservice architectural principles and patterns widely adopted and reported in 23 case studies, together with a summary of the advantages, disadvantages, and lessons learned for each pattern from the case studies. Finally, we mapped the existing microservices-specific techniques in order to understand how to continuously deliver value in a DevOps pipeline. We depicted the current research, reporting gaps and trends. Conclusion: Different patterns emerge for different migration, orchestration, storage and deployment settings. The results also show the lack of empirical work on microservices-specific techniques, especially for the release phase in DevOps.

Julkaisufoorumi-taso