TUTCRIS - Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto

TUTCRIS

Differences in Organizational Cultures - A Challenge for IT Projects

Tutkimustuotos

Yksityiskohdat

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
KustantajaTampere University of Technology
Sivumäärä248
ISBN (elektroninen)978-952-15-3004-3
ISBN (painettu)978-952-15-2968-9
TilaJulkaistu - 11 tammikuuta 2013
OKM-julkaisutyyppiG4 Monografiaväitöskirja

Julkaisusarja

NimiTampere University of Technology. Publication
KustantajaTampere University of Technology
Vuosikerta1105
ISSN (painettu)1459-2045

Tiivistelmä

An organization is a system of activities that consists of two or more persons, organizations or both. It has certain goals it is aiming to achieve. An organization is continuously and in most cases consciously coordinated by an officially nominated or informally selected leader, and the organization itself can be legally constituted or informal. The cooperative nature of an organization means that the survival of the organization is dependent on both the willingness and the ability of its members to cooperate and communicate. An organization may be born of “itself” if two potential members find it useful to cooperate, or it can be established by a certain founder or founders. An organization is a small society with its own particular culture that affects the behavior of the members. This inherent value system, known as the organizational culture, can be designed for a certain purpose or it may have arisen unconsciously. The visible signs of an organizational culture include organizational design, dress codes, graphic layouts, or status symbols. The invisible side of organizational culture consists of values and beliefs to which the members of an organization conform, often unconscious of the impacts of this commitment. This invisible part of culture gives a form to the visible (or audible) manifestations of organizational culture. The organizational culture of companies is often called business culture. Five different studies were conducted to approach the impact of differences in business cultures between customer and supplier on the success of an IT project: a literature review, case study, complementary study to the case study, Delphi-based study for experienced experts, and an open survey for grassroots users. The results of each study were consistent with each other and proved that differing organizational cultures must be taken into account when setting, planning and managing an IT project. The impacts of differences can be both positive and negative. Special attention should be paid to those differences and organizational characteristics that have been experienced as having mostly negative affects. These characteristics were • The lack of a common language • The lack of managerial support and commitment to the project • Differences in the parties’ organizational structures • Substantial differences in the size, ownership, and corporate form of the parties. A list of questions to be asked and activities to take part in was produced during the Delphi process in order to find out if there were differences that should be paid more attention to during the different phases of project. According to the case study, differences in the size and structure of the organization, different juridical forms or form of ownership and differences in corporate relationships or in styles of using power have their impacts on co-operation. The unexpected finding that dividing tasks according to gender might be a risk factor highlighted a need to study the equality policy and situation in firms included in the case study. In this complementary study, a weak correlation between an organization’s official equality policy and the success of an IT project was found. In addition to the themes named above, the Delphi-based survey conducted in 2010 highlighted two other themes: differences in understanding time, and the importance of a common language. An open survey, conducted in 2011 among the end users and grass-root workers involved in IT projects, confirmed the earlier findings and highlighted the importance of prompt and understandable communication, management’s involvement in the project, respect of common goals and timetables, and a clear and transparent hierarchy and command chain on both sides.

Latausten tilastot

Ei tietoja saatavilla