Legitimacy Building in a Whole Supply Network during its Formation Phase
|Kustantaja||Tampere University of Technology|
|Tila||Julkaistu - 13 lokakuuta 2017|
|Nimi||Tampere University of Technology. Publication|
The legitimacy-building process was researched in the case of one whole supply network of 20– 26 Finnish maritime organizations in a three-year networking project using pragmatic research philosophy. The mainly qualitative empirical research material was collected by means of interviewing the network actors and observing the network’s events and their respective documentation. The manifestations of the legitimacy-building dimensions as well as the contingencies were analysed at the inter-organizational network level.
The research results show that especially the network’s strategic intents and communicating them to the network organizations are an essential dimension in the legitimacy building of a whole network during its formation. It is particularly noticeable that the strategic intents of a whole network can be multiple, may even overlap and are achieved asynchronously and, if unclear, they may cause issues in network legitimacy building.
This dissertation research makes several theoretical and practical contributions. From the viewpoint of the emerging network theory of whole networks, the results clarify the dimensions of legitimacy building in the formation phase, specifically in whole supply networks. Additionally, it gives new information on legitimacy building in whole networks in completely unexplored prenetwork circumstances. Furthermore, the results add to the discussion of supply network archetypes and various contingencies, which affect the legitimacy building of a whole network during its formation. Moreover, there are practical implications for both organization leaders contemplating network collaboration and also those managing it. First of all, the pre-conditions of legitimacy building shed a lot of light on the readiness of the network for collaboration, and thus the network’s legitimacy building. Secondly, the four dimensions of legitimacy building can be used as a general level roadmap for network legitimacy building. By investing in clarifying the strategic goals of the network, specifying a network structure that is suitable for achievement of the network’s goals, supporting the network’s interaction, and as a result, enabling the creation of the network’s own identity, the ability of a network to build both internal and external legitimacy is enhanced.