Real Estate Development Externalities: Impacts on Housing Prices and Socio-Economic Segregation
|Kustantaja||Tampere University of Technology|
|Tila||Julkaistu - 18 toukokuuta 2018|
|Nimi||Tampere University of Technology. Publication|
(i) Only minor depreciation was estimated to be attributable to higher proportion of rental housing. First, this should alleviate prejudices against rental housing. Second, the results contribute to policy debate of whether home-ownership should be subsidized. Based on the findings from the externalities point of view, heavy subsidization of homeownership may not be justified and this should be brought into discussion.
(ii) Senior houses were estimated to be built in areas where housing prices are appreciated relatively higher. Also in the post-development period, flat prices in close proximity to senior house developments remained higher, albeit no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-development prices was detected. However, when also other types of developments were simultaneously allowed in the surroundings, post-development prices were found to be positive and statistically different from pre-development prices. These findings encourage adopting more integrated and systemic approaches to neighborhood development and including senior houses as a part of such development strategies.
(iii) Development of new residential multi-story apartment buildings was estimated to have no statistically significant impact on the prices of nearby flats from 1960s and 1970s. Thus, no evidence of any harmful effect in such cases was found. While these findings should alleviate concerns of the impacts of land use change, they do not, however, provide a clear incentive to initiate infill projects.
(iv) From the spatial perspective, socio-economic segregation seems to be a relatively permanent phenomenon. The analyzed indicators suggest that spatial segregation has increased in major Finnish cities in the 21st century but, however, the pace has remained relatively low. Real estate development may provide tools to revitalize neighborhoods and prevent adverse effects of segregation at neighborhood level. However, the analysis at grid cell level does not provide adequate evidence for long-term decision-making. Therefore, more research on different scales, such as neighborhood level, is needed to properly understand the bounds of possibilities.