TUTCRIS - Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto

TUTCRIS

Received Signal Strength models for WLAN and BLE-based indoor positioning in multi-floor buildings

Tutkimustuotosvertaisarvioitu

Standard

Received Signal Strength models for WLAN and BLE-based indoor positioning in multi-floor buildings. / Lohan, Elena-Simona; Talvitie, Jukka; Figueiredo e Silva, Pedro; Nurminen, Henri; Ali-Löytty, Simo; Piche, Robert.

International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS). IEEE, 2015.

Tutkimustuotosvertaisarvioitu

Harvard

Lohan, E-S, Talvitie, J, Figueiredo e Silva, P, Nurminen, H, Ali-Löytty, S & Piche, R 2015, Received Signal Strength models for WLAN and BLE-based indoor positioning in multi-floor buildings. julkaisussa International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS). IEEE, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOCALIZATION AND GNSS, 1/01/00. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL-GNSS.2015.7217154

APA

Vancouver

Author

Lohan, Elena-Simona ; Talvitie, Jukka ; Figueiredo e Silva, Pedro ; Nurminen, Henri ; Ali-Löytty, Simo ; Piche, Robert. / Received Signal Strength models for WLAN and BLE-based indoor positioning in multi-floor buildings. International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS). IEEE, 2015.

Bibtex - Lataa

@inproceedings{93b614fbe0c94647b141ae7485cf53e6,
title = "Received Signal Strength models for WLAN and BLE-based indoor positioning in multi-floor buildings",
abstract = "This paper investigates the similarities and differences of the signal strength fluctuations and positioning accuracy in indoor scenarios for three types of wireless area networks: two Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) at 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency, respectively, and one Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN), namely the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). Two path-loss models based on weighted centroids and non-negative least squares estimation are presented: one including a floor loss factor, and the other one ignoring the floor losses, and the three signal types are compared in terms of the path-loss parameters, channel fluctuations and positioning accuracy, namely the distance errors and floor detection probabilities. The comparison is done based on real-field measurement data collected from a university building in Tampere, Finland. It is shown that all these three signal types have similar shadowing variances and close path-loss parameter values, and that a path-loss model considering floor losses gives the best floor detection probability, but not necessarily the smallest distance error.",
author = "Elena-Simona Lohan and Jukka Talvitie and {Figueiredo e Silva}, Pedro and Henri Nurminen and Simo Ali-L{\"o}ytty and Robert Piche",
note = "ORG=elt,0.7 ORG=ase,0.2 ORG=mat,0.1",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1109/ICL-GNSS.2015.7217154",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781479998593",
booktitle = "International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS)",
publisher = "IEEE",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Lataa

TY - GEN

T1 - Received Signal Strength models for WLAN and BLE-based indoor positioning in multi-floor buildings

AU - Lohan, Elena-Simona

AU - Talvitie, Jukka

AU - Figueiredo e Silva, Pedro

AU - Nurminen, Henri

AU - Ali-Löytty, Simo

AU - Piche, Robert

N1 - ORG=elt,0.7 ORG=ase,0.2 ORG=mat,0.1

PY - 2015/6/23

Y1 - 2015/6/23

N2 - This paper investigates the similarities and differences of the signal strength fluctuations and positioning accuracy in indoor scenarios for three types of wireless area networks: two Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) at 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency, respectively, and one Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN), namely the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). Two path-loss models based on weighted centroids and non-negative least squares estimation are presented: one including a floor loss factor, and the other one ignoring the floor losses, and the three signal types are compared in terms of the path-loss parameters, channel fluctuations and positioning accuracy, namely the distance errors and floor detection probabilities. The comparison is done based on real-field measurement data collected from a university building in Tampere, Finland. It is shown that all these three signal types have similar shadowing variances and close path-loss parameter values, and that a path-loss model considering floor losses gives the best floor detection probability, but not necessarily the smallest distance error.

AB - This paper investigates the similarities and differences of the signal strength fluctuations and positioning accuracy in indoor scenarios for three types of wireless area networks: two Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) at 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency, respectively, and one Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN), namely the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). Two path-loss models based on weighted centroids and non-negative least squares estimation are presented: one including a floor loss factor, and the other one ignoring the floor losses, and the three signal types are compared in terms of the path-loss parameters, channel fluctuations and positioning accuracy, namely the distance errors and floor detection probabilities. The comparison is done based on real-field measurement data collected from a university building in Tampere, Finland. It is shown that all these three signal types have similar shadowing variances and close path-loss parameter values, and that a path-loss model considering floor losses gives the best floor detection probability, but not necessarily the smallest distance error.

U2 - 10.1109/ICL-GNSS.2015.7217154

DO - 10.1109/ICL-GNSS.2015.7217154

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781479998593

BT - International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS)

PB - IEEE

ER -